You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 300 No. 14, October 8, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Venous Thromboembolism
 •Diagnosis
 •Ultrasonography
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Noninvasive Diagnosis of Deep Vein Thrombosis

C. Seth Landefeld, MD

JAMA. 2008;300(14):1696-1697.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

More than a million patients in the United States seek medical care each year for leg pain and swelling.1-2 Often, these symptoms raise the specter of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), which is diagnosed in roughly 20% of those persons evaluated.3 Proximal DVT—thrombosis of an iliac, deep femoral, or popliteal vein—is rightly feared. Untreated, proximal DVT often leads to symptomatic pulmonary embolism, which may be fatal, to progression or recurrence of the DVT, and to the postthrombotic syndrome of chronic pain, swelling, and difficulty walking. Anticoagulant therapy for proximal DVT prevents these complications in most patients4; however, this treatment is inconvenient, costly, and sometimes harmful, and must be avoided in patients whose symptoms are not attributable to DVT. The accurate diagnosis of proximal DVT is therefore critical.

Diagnosing DVT by physical examination is inaccurate, and until 25 years ago, radiocontrast venography was the only accurate diagnostic . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliations: University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, and the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences at Stanford University, Stanford, California.


RELATED ARTICLE

Serial 2-Point Ultrasonography Plus D-Dimer vs Whole-Leg Color-Coded Doppler Ultrasonography for Diagnosing Suspected Symptomatic Deep Vein Thrombosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Enrico Bernardi, Giuseppe Camporese, Harry R. Büller, Sergio Siragusa, Davide Imberti, Arrigo Berchio, Angelo Ghirarduzzi, Fabio Verlato, Raffaela Anastasio, Carolina Prati, Andrea Piccioli, Raffaele Pesavento, Carlo Bova, Patrizia Maltempi, Nello Zanatta, Alberto Cogo, Roberto Cappelli, Eugenio Bucherini, Stefano Cuppini, Franco Noventa, Paolo Prandoni, and for the Erasmus Study Group
JAMA. 2008;300(14):1653-1659.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

2-Point vs. Whole-Leg Ultrasonography in DVT Diagnosis
JWatch General 2008;2008:1-1.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.