You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 300 No. 16, October 22/29, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Law and Medicine
 •Quality of Care
 •Patient Safety/ Medical Error
 •Drug Therapy
 •Adverse Effects
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Prescription Drugs, Products Liability, and Preemption of Tort Litigation

Catherine D. DeAngelis, MD, MPH; Phil B. Fontanarosa, MD, MBA

JAMA. 2008;300(16):1939-1941.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The benefits and risks associated with pharmaceutical agents and medical devices have received increasing attention from the medical community, the public, and government agencies. Serious concerns about US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) capabilities and oversight for ensuring accurate determination of safety and efficacy, appropriate mechanisms and decisions regarding drug and device approval, and effective postmarketing surveillance have prompted investigations by the Institute of Medicine1 and by an FDA blue ribbon commission.2 Major legislation3 has been enacted to improve the agency's ability to fulfill the daunting responsibility of ensuring that pharmaceutical products and medical devices approved for marketing are safe.4

Even though the evaluation of new drugs and devices is technically rigorous, the current approach of basing drug approval decisions on clinical trials of efficacy that include relatively small numbers of patients virtually guarantees that the full risks and complete . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliations: Dr DeAngelis is Editor in Chief and Dr Fontanarosa (phil.fontanarosa@jama-archives.org) is Executive Deputy Editor, JAMA.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Safety-Related Regulatory Actions for Biologicals Approved in the United States and the European Union
Thijs J. Giezen, Aukje K. Mantel-Teeuwisse, Sabine M. J. M. Straus, Huub Schellekens, Hubert G. M. Leufkens, and Antoine C. G. Egberts
JAMA. 2008;300(16):1887-1896.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Regulating the Safety of Pharmaceuticals: The FDA, Preemption, and the Public's Health
Gostin
JAMA 2009;301:2036-2037.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.