 |
 |

Effects of Exercise Training on Health Status in Patients With Chronic Heart FailureHF-ACTION Randomized Controlled Trial
Kathryn E. Flynn, PhD;
Ileana L. Piña, MD;
David J. Whellan, MD, MHS;
Li Lin, MS;
James A. Blumenthal, PhD;
Stephen J. Ellis, PhD;
Lawrence J. Fine, MD, DrPH;
Jonathan G. Howlett, MD;
Steven J. Keteyian, PhD;
Dalane W. Kitzman, MD;
William E. Kraus, MD;
Nancy Houston Miller, RN, BSN;
Kevin A. Schulman, MD;
John A. Spertus, MD, MPH;
Christopher M. OConnor, MD;
Kevin P. Weinfurt, PhD
JAMA. 2009;301(14):1451-1459.
Context Findings from previous studies of the effects of exercise training on patient-reported health status have been inconsistent.
Objective To test the effects of exercise training on health status among patients with heart failure.
Design, Setting, and Patients Multicenter, randomized controlled trial among 2331 medically stable outpatients with heart failure with left ventricular ejection fraction of 35% or less. Patients were randomized from April 2003 through February 2007.
Interventions Usual care plus aerobic exercise training (n = 1172), consisting of 36 supervised sessions followed by home-based training, vs usual care alone (n = 1159). Randomization was stratified by heart failure etiology, which was a covariate in all models.
Main Outcome Measures Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) overall summary scale and key subscales at baseline, every 3 months for 12 months, and annually thereafter for up to 4 years. The KCCQ is scored from 0 to 100 with higher scores corresponding to better health status. Treatment group effects were estimated using linear mixed models according to the intention-to-treat principle.
Results Median follow-up was 2.5 years. At 3 months, usual care plus exercise training led to greater improvement in the KCCQ overall summary score (mean, 5.21; 95% confidence interval, 4.42 to 6.00) compared with usual care alone (3.28; 95% confidence interval, 2.48 to 4.09). The additional 1.93-point increase (95% confidence interval, 0.84 to 3.01) in the exercise training group was statistically significant (P < .001). After 3 months, there were no further significant changes in KCCQ score for either group (P = .85 for the difference between slopes), resulting in a sustained, greater improvement overall for the exercise group (P < .001). Results were similar on the KCCQ subscales, and no subgroup interactions were detected.
Conclusions Exercise training conferred modest but statistically significant improvements in self-reported health status compared with usual care without training. Improvements occurred early and persisted over time.
Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00047437.
Author Affiliations: Duke Clinical Research Institute (Drs Flynn, Whellan, Ellis, Schulman, OConnor, and Weinfurt and Ms Lin) and Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (Drs Flynn, Blumenthal, and Weinfurt) and Medicine (Drs Kraus, Schulman, and OConnor), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio (Dr Piña); Department of Medicine, Jefferson Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (Dr Whellan); Division of Prevention and Population Sciences, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland (Dr Fine); Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California (Ms Houston Miller); Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada (Dr Howlett); Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan (Dr Keteyian); Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina (Dr Kitzman); Mid America Heart Institute, Saint Luke's Health System, Kansas City, Missouri (Dr Spertus); and University of Missouri–Kansas City (Dr Spertus).
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
Efficacy and Safety of Exercise Training in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: HF-ACTION Randomized Controlled Trial
Christopher M. OConnor, David J. Whellan, Kerry L. Lee, Steven J. Keteyian, Lawton S. Cooper, Stephen J. Ellis, Eric S. Leifer, William E. Kraus, Dalane W. Kitzman, James A. Blumenthal, David S. Rendall, Nancy Houston Miller, Jerome L. Fleg, Kevin A. Schulman, Robert S. McKelvie, Faiez Zannad, Ileana L. Piña, and for the HF-ACTION Investigators
JAMA. 2009;301(14):1439-1450.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
 |
State of the Science: Promoting Self-Care in Persons With Heart Failure: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association
Riegel et al.
Circulation 2009;120:1141-1163.
FULL TEXT
Method for Establishing Authorship in a Multicenter Clinical Trial
Whellan et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2009;151:414-420.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Exercise Training for Heart Failure Patients
JWatch General 2009;2009:5-5.
FULL TEXT
All you need to read in the other general journals
BMJ 2009;338:b1526-b1526.
FULL TEXT
Efficacy and Safety of Exercise Training in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: HF-ACTION Randomized Controlled Trial
O'Connor et al.
JAMA 2009;301:1439-1450.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Exercise Training in Patients with LV Systolic Dysfunction
Journal Watch Cardiology 2009;2009:1-1.
FULL TEXT
|