You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 301 No. 16, April 22/29, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Aging/ Geriatrics
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Arrhythmias
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Drug Therapy
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Equivalence of Generic and Brand-Name Drugs for Cardiovascular Disease—Reply

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In Reply: Dr Carter points to differences in rates of medication absorption from his research comparing the effects of brand-name and generic verapamil on older patients and attributes these differences to clinical characteristics of this patient subgroup. Dr Zema suggests that variations in the chemical structure of different verapamil preparations may play a role. A third possibility is intraparticipant biological variability, because differences in verapamil pharmacokinetics have been noted in individual patients taking brand-name Isoptin SR (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Illinois).1 However, we disagree with the conclusion that generic cardiovascular medications cannot be substituted for brand-name drugs. First, there are inconsistencies with the findings. For example, in one study2 the generic formulation exhibiting an enhanced effect on one electrocardiographic measurement also demonstrated a slightly diminished effect on supine mean arterial pressure, as well as no significant effect on heart rate and standing mean arterial pressure. Second, none of the variations . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Aaron S. Kesselheim, MD, JD, MPH
akesselheim@partners.org

Alexander S. Misono, BA; William H. Shrank, MD, MSHS
Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

Equivalence of Generic and Brand-Name Drugs for Cardiovascular Disease
Barry L. Carter
JAMA. 2009;301(16):1654.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Equivalence of Generic and Brand-Name Drugs for Cardiovascular Disease
Michael James Zema
JAMA. 2009;301(16):1654-1655.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Equivalence of Generic and Brand-Name Drugs for Cardiovascular Disease
James A. Reiffel
JAMA. 2009;301(16):1655.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.