You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 301 No. 8, February 25, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (16)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Quality of Care
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Reassessment of Clinical Practice Guidelines

Go Gently Into That Good Night

Terrence M. Shaneyfelt, MD, MPH; Robert M. Centor, MD

JAMA. 2009;301(8):868-869.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In 1990, the Institute of Medicine proposed guideline development to reduce inappropriate health care variation by assisting patient and practitioner decisions.1 Unfortunately, too many current guidelines have become marketing and opinion-based pieces, delivering directive rather than assistive statements.

Current use of the term guideline has strayed far from the original intent of the Institute of Medicine. Most current articles called "guidelines" are actually expert consensus reports. It is not surprising, then, that the article by Tricoci et al2 in this issue of JAMA demonstrates that revisions of the American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines have shifted to more class II recommendations (conflicting evidence and/or divergence of opinion about the usefulness/efficacy of a procedure or treatment) and that 48% of the time, these recommendations are based on the lowest level of evidence (level C: expert opinion, case studies, or . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliations: Veterans Affairs Medical Center (Dr Shaneyfelt) and Department of Medicine, University of Alabama School of Medicine (Drs Shaneyfelt and Centor), Birmingham; Huntsville Regional Medical Campus, Huntsville, Alabama (Dr Centor).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

Clinical Practice Guidelines and Scientific Evidence
Christian M. Pettker and Edmund F. Funai
JAMA. 2009;302(2):143.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical Practice Guidelines and Scientific Evidence
Elliott M. Antman and Raymond J. Gibbons
JAMA. 2009;302(2):143-144.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical Practice Guidelines and Scientific Evidence
Mark D. Huffman and Robert O. Bonow
JAMA. 2009;302(2):144-145.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical Practice Guidelines and Scientific Evidence
John Concato and Ralph I. Horwitz
JAMA. 2009;302(2):145.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical Practice Guidelines and Scientific Evidence
Robert S. Bobrow
JAMA. 2009;302(2):145.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical Practice Guidelines and Scientific Evidence
Shyam S. Kothari
JAMA. 2009;302(2):145.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLE

Scientific Evidence Underlying the ACC/AHA Clinical Practice Guidelines
Pierluigi Tricoci, Joseph M. Allen, Judith M. Kramer, Robert M. Califf, and Sidney C. Smith, Jr
JAMA. 2009;301(8):831-841.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Clinical Practice Guidelines and Scientific Evidence
Huffman and Bonow
JAMA 2009;302:144-145.
FULL TEXT  

Clinical Practice Guidelines and Scientific Evidence
Concato and Horwitz
JAMA 2009;302:145-145.
FULL TEXT  

Clinical Practice Guidelines and Scientific Evidence
Pettker and Funai
JAMA 2009;302:143-143.
FULL TEXT  

Clinical Practice Guidelines and Scientific Evidence
Antman and Gibbons
JAMA 2009;302:143-144.
FULL TEXT  

Clinical Practice Guidelines and Scientific Evidence
Bobrow
JAMA 2009;302:145-145.
FULL TEXT  

Clinical Practice Guidelines and Scientific Evidence
Kothari
JAMA 2009;302:145-145.
FULL TEXT  

Intravenous fluids in adults undergoing surgery
Liu and Finfer
BMJ 2009;338:b2418-b2418.
FULL TEXT  

Improving the Primary Care-Specialty Care Interface: Getting From Here to There
Chen and Yee
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:1024-1026.
FULL TEXT  

Toward international primary care reform
Starfield
CMAJ 2009;180:1091-1092.
FULL TEXT  

Not Enough Evidence for Evidence-Based Guidelines?
Journal Watch Cardiology 2009;2009:3-3.
FULL TEXT  

Critique of Clinical Practice Guidelines
JWatch General 2009;2009:1-1.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.