You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 302 No. 1, July 1, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Commentary
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Informatics/ Internet in Medicine
 •Informatics, Other
 •Medical Practice
 •Health Policy
 •Medical Ethics
 •Medical Practice, Other
 •Public Health, Other
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Case for Public Ownership of Patient Data

Marc A. Rodwin, JD, PhD

JAMA. 2009;302(1):86-88.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The allocation of $19 billion by the US Congress to promote the adoption of electronic medical records makes feasible the collection of aggregate patient data that could vastly improve patient safety, public health monitoring, and medical knowledge. The US Food and Drug Administration could ascertain the percentage of patients who experienced adverse reactions from a specific drug, then warn physicians or take other action. Researchers could learn how patients respond to alternative therapies and assess their relative effectiveness and safety. They could study populations and variables not present in clinical trials and compare medical facilities and health care systems. It is no surprise that Academy Health advocated "development and dissemination of secondary health data as a public good."1

Yet today, organizations with medical, prescription, and billing records treat patient data as if those data were their private property. Doing so precludes forming comprehensive databases required . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Are Patient Data Private Property?

Author Affiliation: Suffolk University Law School, Boston, Massachusetts.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Ethical Collection, Storage, and Use of Public Health Data: A Proposal for a National Privacy Protection
Lisa M. Lee and Lawrence O. Gostin
JAMA. 2009;302(1):82-84.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Building Bridges Between Medical Care and Public Health
Nicole Lurie and Allen Fremont
JAMA. 2009;302(1):84-86.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.