 |
 |

The Case for Public Ownership of Patient Data
Marc A. Rodwin, JD, PhD
JAMA. 2009;302(1):86-88.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
The allocation of $19 billion by the US Congress to promote the adoption of electronic medical records makes feasible the collection of aggregate patient data that could vastly improve patient safety, public health monitoring, and medical knowledge. The US Food and Drug Administration could ascertain the percentage of patients who experienced adverse reactions from a specific drug, then warn physicians or take other action. Researchers could learn how patients respond to alternative therapies and assess their relative effectiveness and safety. They could study populations and variables not present in clinical trials and compare medical facilities and health care systems. It is no surprise that Academy Health advocated "development and dissemination of secondary health data as a public good."1
Yet today, organizations with medical, prescription, and billing records treat patient data as if those data were their private property. Doing so precludes forming comprehensive databases required . . . [Full Text of this Article] Are Patient Data Private Property?
Author Affiliation: Suffolk University Law School, Boston, Massachusetts.
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLES
Ethical Collection, Storage, and Use of Public Health Data: A Proposal for a National Privacy Protection
Lisa M. Lee and Lawrence O. Gostin
JAMA. 2009;302(1):82-84.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Building Bridges Between Medical Care and Public Health
Nicole Lurie and Allen Fremont
JAMA. 2009;302(1):84-86.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|