You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 302 No. 19, November 18, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Neurology
 •Cerebrovascular Disease
 •Stroke
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Biomarkers for Prediction of Cardiovascular Events

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Dr Melander and colleagues1 suggested that gains in risk prediction using new biomarkers for cardiovascular disease are minimal using risk reclassification, a technique that can help determine whether new markers can change clinical decisions.2 In contrast to similar analyses using data from the Women's Health Study, the Physicians' Health Study, and the Framingham Heart Study, there was no improvement in risk stratification with new markers, including C-reactive protein (CRP).

However, the study's methods and conclusions raise some questions. First, while the authors presented the net reclassification improvement (NRI) for each of the new markers, they did not present the NRI for the traditional markers, thus providing no basis for comparison. The NRI is similar for traditional measures and for CRP in predicting cardiovascular disease,2 and this comparison would indicate the power of their study to detect important differences. Second, the NRI and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) values . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Nancy R. Cook, ScD
ncook@rics.bwh.harvard.edu
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Novel and Conventional Biomarkers for Prediction of Incident Cardiovascular Events in the Community
Olle Melander, Christopher Newton-Cheh, Peter Almgren, Bo Hedblad, Göran Berglund, Gunnar Engström, Margaretha Persson, J. Gustav Smith, Martin Magnusson, Anders Christensson, Joachim Struck, Nils G. Morgenthaler, Andreas Bergmann, Michael J. Pencina, and Thomas J. Wang
JAMA. 2009;302(1):49-57.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTERS

Biomarkers for Prediction of Cardiovascular Events
Robert S. Rosenstein and David Parra
JAMA. 2009;302(19):2089-2090.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Biomarkers for Prediction of Cardiovascular Events—Reply
Olle Melander, Christopher Newton-Cheh, and Thomas J. Wang
JAMA. 2009;302(19):2090.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.