You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 149 No. 1, May 3, 1952 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

TE RRAMYCIN AND AUREOMYCIN IN SURGICAL INFECTIONS

REPORT OF TWO HUNDRED CASES

Lieutenant Colonel Edwin J. Pulaski; Major Curtis P. Artz; Captain Eric Reiss, MC

J Am Med Assoc. 1952;149(1):35-40.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Although other antibiotics have been introduced since penicillin became generally available, it still remains the most widely used of these agents. This might be expected, since it is unsurpassed in the treatment of many bacterial infections, especially those caused by pyogenic cocci. On the other hand, its scope of usefulness is not all-inclusive. Mixed infections respond poorly to penicillin alone. Many strains of staphylococci are penicillin-resistant.1 Some patients cannot tolerate penicillin because of hypersensitivity, a problem which perhaps may be solved by the introduction of penicillin O, although this new product has not yet been fully investigated.2 Finally, although oral administration would be preferable in the use of antibiotics, the full potentialities of penicillin by this route remain to be established.

The need for an alternative antibiotic agent is therefore clear, and at the present time three possibilities present themselves: (1) chloramphenicol3 and (2) aureomycin,4 which . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

United States Army

From the Surgical Research Unit, Brooke Army Hospital, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, Texas.


Footnotes

The aureomycin used in this study was supplied by Lederle Laboratories Division, American Cyanamid Company. The terramycin was supplied by Charles Pfizer & Company, Inc.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1952 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.