You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 204 No. 4, April 22, 1968 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Basic Radiation Biology

by Donald J. Pizzarello and Richard I. Witcofski, 301 pp, with illus, $9.50, Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1967.

E. James Potchen, MD, Reviewer
St. Louis, Mo

JAMA. 1968;204(4):342.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Modern technology, responsible for the increased clinical application of electromagnetic energies to both diagnosis and therapy, requires the new physician to have an understanding of radiation biology that was not essential for his predecessors. These complex concepts of physics and biology are difficult to teach and comprehend. It was a pleasure, therefore, to read Basic Radiation Biology, which is lucid, concise, and complete.

The review of pertinent physics is well written and does not require a knowledge of mathematics. There are, however, in the didactic presentations some inadequacies and room for controversy, which are apparently due to the need for brevity.

The second portion of this book, "Interaction of Radiation with Living Systems," is one of the best introductions to this material I have read. It is sufficiently detailed to present the subject clearly without overburdening the reader with controversial material.

The writing style could be improved, and this book . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1968 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.