This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

David S. Friendly, MD
Children's Hospital Washington, DC

JAMA. 1970;211(1):124.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor:—

Cave et al (210:309, 1969) emphasized the high rate of positive cultures for Neisseria gonorrhoeae in both obstetric and gynecologic populations. Other recent investigations^1-4 in North American prepartum clinics have likewise revealed high rates of infection. Cave et al rightly point out the advisability of routine testing whenever pelvic examinations are done on female patients. Not mentioned by the authors, however, is one of the most important reasons to routinely test prepartum patients, ie, to protect the eyes of their unborn babies.

The worldwide increase in gonorrhea is creating conditions favorable for an increase in gonorrheal ophthalmia neonatorum. Since no comprehensive surveys have been undertaken and since gonorrheal ophthalmia is not always reported to public health agencies, it is difficult to know if the anticipated rise in gonorrheal ophthalmia neonatorum is actually occurring. However, several institutions have reported increased numbers of cases in recent years. . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?