You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 211 No. 12, March 23, 1970 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Prematurity and the Obstetrician

by Denis Cavanagh, M R Talisman, 542 pp, with illus, $16.50, New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1969.

Jan Schneider, MD, Reviewer
University of Michigan Ann Arbor

JAMA. 1970;211(12):2019.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

There can be little challenge of the authors' statement that, "Prematurity is the greatest single problem facing Obstetricians, Pediatricians and parents in the United States today." This volume aims at bridging the gap between the several professional disciplines involved. It states, as its goal, "clearly to make obstetricians more aware of their task in preventing the birth of underweight infants." The result is an uneasy amalgam of fragmented textbook obstetrics, extensive literature reviews, and sundry chapters of pediatrics, pathology, and other areas of related interest.

The volume is unlikely to achieve its goal. The chapters on obstetrics are too simple for the specialist and at times statements dealing specifically with prematurity appear to have been added as appendages to standard obstetric text. The numerous quotations and summaries from the literature are frequently presented in quick succession without editorial comment even when conflicting opinions are juxtaposed. Conclusions drawn from the authors' . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1970 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.