You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 211 No. 2, January 12, 1970 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Cardiac Roentgenology: Plain Films and Angiocardiographic Findings

by William T. Meszaros, 586 pp, 455 illus, $38, Springfield, Ill, Charles C Thomas Publisher, 1969.

Joseph E. Whitley, MD, Reviewer
The Bowman Gray School of Medicine Winston-Salem, NC

JAMA. 1970;211(2):302.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Dr. Meszaros undertook the mighty task of describing and illustrating in one volume the radiologic findings in acquired and congenital heart disease. How were so many diseases of the heart and great vessels covered in 586 pages? One of the stated aims of the book is to provide information about cardiac roentgenology to noncardiologic clinicians and radiologists on whom the subleties of electrocardiography, pressure curve analysis, etc, would probably be lost. Thus, the basic clinical, electrocardiographic, and hemodynamic data are only superficially covered in most disease states and deleted altogether in the more exotic. The plain film, fluoroscopic, and the angiographic findings are described and usually illustrated. The illustrations are somewhat uneven but adequate. The radiographs and their reproduction suffer by comparison with such older, less comprehensive classics as the 1959 Diagnosis of Congenital Heart Disease by Kjellberg et al. The lists of references are good.

There are some anachronisms. . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1970 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.