You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 213 No. 7, August 17, 1970 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Laboratory Diagnosis of Kidney Diseases

compiled and edited by F. William Sunderman and F. William Sunderman, Jr., 587 pp, with illus, $27.50, St. Louis: Warren H. Green, Inc., 1970.

Carl F. Anderson, MD, Reviewer
Mayo Clinic Rochester, Minn

JAMA. 1970;213(7):1196.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

This book contains the edited proceedings of a seminar held during November 1967. Each of the book's 50 chapters is, in fact, a separate paper. Of the 1,595 references, only 23 are dated later than 1967. Several papers are exceptionally well written. These deal with identification of urinary pigments, the differentiation of hemoglobinuria and myoglobinuria, urine and serum proteins, acute renal failure, primary glomerular disease, and renal complications of diabetes mellitus. Other well-written papers describe microdissection of the nephron, urinary calculi, drug-induced nephropathy, immunopathogenesis of renal disease, and the association between renal and liver disease.

There is a genuine need for a book to describe current laboratory methods and integrate the results obtained with historical, physical and roentgenographic findings. I had hoped this book would fill the void, but it does not. The compilation of separate papers without integrating discussions or summaries does not achieve a systematic cohesive description of . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1970 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.