You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 217 No. 12, September 20, 1971 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The University Group Diabetes Program

A Further Statistical Analysis of the Mortality Findings

Jerome Cornfield

JAMA. 1971;217(12):1676-1687.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The basic conclusion of the University Group Diabetes Program on tolbutamide is: "the findings of this study indicate that the combination of diet and tolbutamide therapy is no more effective than diet alone in prolonging life. Moreover, the findings suggest that tolbutamide and diet may be less effective than diet alone or than diet and insulin at least in so far as cardiovascular mortality is concerned."1 With no evidence of efficacy and a definite possibility of toxicity the investigators concluded that the safety of the patients still receiving tolbutamide therapy required its discontinuance and that the factual basis for this decision needed to be communicated to the biomedical scientific community. This prudent decision and moderately worded conclusion has been received by some critics with a hostility which has no discernible scientific basis. The following analysis is largely confined to Dr. Schor's analysis (see page 1671).

In general, independent repetition . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

From the Department of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh.


Footnotes

Although the new data presented may be considered official UGDP data, the interpretations are my own and do not necessarily represent the point of view of the investigators or their Executive Committee.

Reprint requests to 9650 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, Md 20014 (Dr. Cornfield).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1971 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.