You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 217 No. 12, September 20, 1971 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Chemical Feast: The Ralph Nader Study Group Report on Food Protection and the Food and Drug Administration

by James S. Turner, 273 pp, $6.95, paper $.95, New York: Grossman Publishers, 1970.

James Harvey Young, PhD, Reviewer
Emory University Atlanta

JAMA. 1971;217(12):1708.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Sixteen of Ralph Nader's bright and idealistic young allies—law, medical, and graduate students—spent the summer of 1969 interviewing Food and Drug Administration personnel and examining FDA records. This report renders their judgment of the agency's role as protector of the nation's food supply: in virtually every respect an "appalling failure."

Concerned by the ecological crisis and moved by a strong antiestablishment bias, these "raiders" hold that food laws have been enacted and enforced so as to benefit industry rather than consumers. We would be better off without the 2,000 or 3,000 food additives now in use. The faintest hint of danger should be enough to ban use of an additive. FDA's "naive faith" in the food industry's professed goal of acting to benefit the consumer causes the agency to squander its power in back-room meetings with food tycoons and to rely on a "ludicrous" voluntary compliance system instead of on . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1971 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.