You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 223 No. 9, February 26, 1973 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Scuba Tank Capacity

Lloyd F. Walk, MD
Belleville, Ill

JAMA. 1973;223(9):1044.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—

In the Nov 6, 1972 issue of THE JOURNAL, Dr. Ronald M. Sommer submits a letter regarding the capacity of a scuba diving tank (222:705, 1972). It is apparent from the information published that Dr. Sommer did not do his homework on the physics of diving and the gas laws involved. Had he done so, he would have found that his 70-cu ft of air single tank, which he states would last 70 minutes at sea level (that presumes a use rate of 1 cu ft/min) would last 35 minutes at 33 feet, 21 minutes at 36 feet, and 17.5 minutes at 99 feet. Dr. Sommer had the right idea but his mathematical progression was wrong. . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1973 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.