You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 227 No. 8, February 25, 1974 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Radiological Atlas of Bone Tumours

vol 2, by the Netherlands Committee on Bone Tumours, pp 269-600, with illus by M. G. Popkes et al, $77, Mouton & Co. (Williams & Wilkins Co.), 1973.

Howard L. Steinbach, MD, Reviewer
University of California School of Medicine San Francisco

JAMA. 1974;227(8):945.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

This long-awaited second volume includes the features that made the first volume on malignant bone tumors an outstanding publication. The initial five pages compile statistical information on the location, age distribution, and incidence of benign and malignant tumors and of other bone diseases. Benign tumors, cysts, other tumor-like lesions, and diseases of the skeleton that produce roentgenographic abnormalities suggestive of neoplasms are discussed and depicted by photographs. A few rare lesions are presented.

Preceding the numerous fine illustrations in each section is a concise presentation of general information on incidence, age, sex, location, clinical features, roentgenographic, pathologic, and histologic appearance, differential diagnosis, and treatment. The information essential for diagnosis appears in as few as two to not more than five pages of text.

The reversal of black with white on the photographs provides better definition of lesions but may cause some confusion, particularly for the neophyte radiologist; however, the photographs . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1974 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.