You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 231 No. 10, March 10, 1975 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Controversy in Obstetrics and Gynecology II

edited by Duncan E. Reid and C. D. Christian, 854 pp, 133 illus, $28.50, Philadelphia, Saunders, 1974.

Robert W. Kistner, MD, Reviewer
Harvard Medical School Boston

JAMA. 1975;231(10):1088.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

This is the second edition of this compendium of controversial topics in obstetrics and gynecology. It comprises 25 subjects authored by 102 nationally known experts. The format for each controversy is arranged to present three or four alternative points of view followed by terse editorial comment. Ten subjects cover basic obstetrical problems such as management of premature rupture of the fetal membranes, impending labor prior to the 35th week, placenta praevia, fetal monitoring, pain relief, trophoblastic disease, and cesarean hysterectomy.

A discussion of medical and surgical methods of conception control is an outstanding contribution since it concentrates on the ever-present controversy of vaginal hysterectomy vs tubal ligation for permanent sterilization. The authors favoring hysterectomy emphasize the fact that abnormal uterine bleeding, pelvic pain, and symptoms of descensus occur in 15% of posttubal ligation patients within three years and that 24% of these patients underwent hysterectomy within five years, 34% within . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Footnotes

Edited by Lester S. King, MD, Contributing Editor.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1975 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.