You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 231 No. 8, February 24, 1975 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Orthostatic Hypotension in Diabetic Patients

Samuel Vaisrub, MD

JAMA. 1975;231(8):847.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

How odd that a giraffe with its heart-to-head distance exceeding 2 meters does not find it difficult to maintain circulatory homeostasis in the upright position, whereas man with a mere 30 cm separating the two organs sometimes does. Physiologists have come closer to explaining the giraffe's circulatory agility1 than the homeostatic sluggishness of humans with orthostatic hypotension.

Failure to regulate blood pressure on assuming the upright position may be idiopathic or secondary to a known neurologic or systemic disease. It is much more common among diabetic patients than in the general population.

The increased prevalence of orthostatic hypotension in diabetics need not be too surprising. Autonomic neuropathy could well compromise baroreceptor reflexes in the carotid sinuses and aortic arch and chemoceptor reflexes in the carotid and aortic bodies. The plausibility of such a mechanism is supported by the frequency of associated peripheral neuropathy in these patients.

Plausibility, however, does . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1975 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.