This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

There Is No FDA for the Surgeon

David H. Spodick, MD

JAMA. 1975;232(1):35-36.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

EACH day, physicians face complex decisions in choosing accurate diagnoses and optimum treatments. We have become quite adept at marshaling objective data for diagnostic choices. Therapeutic decisions must often depend on less substantial evidence. In consequence, elaborate methods are required for clinical trials to test the effectiveness and safety of new drugs, but, somehow, the same type of rigorous criteria are not demanded for trials of new operations. Much thought and huge sums of money have been directed toward ensuring the outcome when the physician writes a prescription, but there is not this type of concern generated when he flourishes a scalpel. If this division of requirements were really proportionate, it might be justified as a backhanded acknowledgment that the pen is indeed mightier than the sword. Unfortunately, this is nottrue; there is no evidence that we need less demanding criteria for making surgical than medical choices.

Comparing Treatments: The . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
Boston

From the Cardiology Division, Lemuel Shattuck Hospital, and the Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston.

Footnotes
Reprint requests to Division of Cardiology, Lemuel Shattuck Hospital, 170 Morton St, Boston, MA 02130 (Dr. Spodick).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?