You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 234 No. 2, October 13, 1975 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  LETTERS
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Overdoses of Chloramphenicol

W. Leigh Thompson, MD
Case Western Reserve University Cleveland

Seth E. Anderson, Jr, MD
National Naval Medical Center Bethesda, Md

James J. Lipsky, MD; Paul S. Lietman, MD
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore

JAMA. 1975;234(2):149-150.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—

Recently, we have become aware of five patients who inadvertently received ten times the intended dose of chloramphenicol. In each of these cases, the origin of the problem was reported to be a misinterpretation of a new labeling of chloramphenicol (Chloromycetin) sodium succinate vials.

The first patient was a 70-year-old woman from Georgia who received an initial 20-gm dose and died 11 hours later. The second patient is a 26-year-old woman from Ohio who received an initial 1-gm dose followed in 7 and 12 hours by two 10-gm doses. Although she was well three hours after the last dose, five hours later severe shock quickly developed with low filling pressures, cyanosis, and coma. The patient responded slowly to fluids and dopamine, without residua. Plasma chloramphenicol measured by an enzymologic assay 5 1/2 hours after the last dose and during shock was 201µg/ml. The third patient is a . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1975 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.