 |
 |

Meningococcal Prophylaxis-Reply
Malcolm S. Artenstein, MD
Walter Reed Army Medical Center Washington, DC
JAMA. 1975;234(2):151.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
In Reply.—
Dr Eickhoff presents a cogent argument for the use of rifampin prophylaxis when meningococcal disease has been diagnosed in one member of a family. Indeed, a number of authorities hold the same opinion. However, in the absence of proved (controlled) efficacy of the drug in preventing meningococcal disease, the controversy becomes merely a matter of divergent opinions based on circumstantial evidence. Minocycline was the choice of some until the recent reports of serious side reactions. I am tempted to predict, therefore, that rifampin, which has immunosuppressive effects and inhibits RNA and DNA polymerases, will eventually be considered too hazardous a drug to be used for a purpose of unproved benefit.
. . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
|