You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 236 No. 20, November 15, 1976 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  LETTERS
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Ultrasound in Evaluating Renal Masses-Reply

Judith Everett, MD
San Diego, Calif

JAMA. 1976;236(20):2286.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Yes, the examination was "satisfactory." After surgery, the pathological specimen disclosed that the tumor was not homogeneous, but had areas of necrosis and hemorrhage.

Recent information also appears to implicate diagnostic ultrasound in the delivery of premature infants where data have indicated fetal maturity.

It is often the "single case" in medicine that leads us to reexamine our diagnostic and therapeutic modalities. This is far more acceptable than continuing to use a procedure because it is "generally accepted." Additional controlled data are obviously needed. . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1976 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.