This Article  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Norman R. Hertzer, MD

JAMA. 1977;237(25):2749.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

At the symposium on venous problems sponsored by Northwestern University in honor of the eminent surgeon and scholar, Geza de Takats, MD, (Chicago, Dec 2-4, 1976) a number of distinguished participants agreed that unnecessary surgical removal of the greater saphenous vein seriously compromises later arterial reconstruction required by some patients. This opinion deserves amplification for the benefit of every physician and surgeon not in attendance.

Autogenous saphenous vein unquestionably is the best graft currently available for replacement of diseased arteries of medium and small diameter, and probably will remain so through the foreseeable future. Although the techniques of endarterectomy and fabric graft bypass are quite satisfactory when applied to the aorta and its large branches, it is likely that many stunning advances in the surgical treatment of arteriosclerosis of the coronary, renal, popliteal, and tibial arteries would have been postponed, if not impossible, without the availability of saphenous vein. In . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
Cleveland Clinic Cleveland

Footnotes
Address editorial communications to the Editor, 535 N Dearborn St, Chicago 60610

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?