This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Herbert N. Hultgren, MD; Timothy Takaro, MD; Katherine M. Detre, MD; Marvin L. Murphy, MD

JAMA. 1978;240(13):1353-1354.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

RECENTLY, Michael E. DeBakey, MD, published a commentary on coronary artery surgery that discussed the Veterans Administration Cooperative Study of Surgical vs Medical Treatment of Stable Angina.¹ In his commentary, he challenged the validity of the interpretations of the data from the VA study and made criticisms of the study that merit reply. The published data from the VA study now include a four-year follow-up,² not a 21-month follow-up as stated by Dr DeBakey. The data have been clearly defined in each publication as preliminary, and a final report will not be made until 1980 when all patients in the study have been followed up for five years. The data presented have primarily referred to survival. Reports concerning relief of angina, changes in exercise performance, and other aspects of quality of life are currently being prepared for publication. No VA study publication has ever challenged the excellent sustained . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
Veterans Administration Hospital Palo Alto, Calif

From the Veterans Administration Hospital, Palo Alto, Calif.

Footnotes
Reprint requests to Veterans Administration Hospital, 3801 Miranda Ave, Palo Alto, CA 94304 (Dr Hultgren).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?