This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

June E. Osborn, MD

JAMA. 1978;240(15):1616-1617.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

REMEMBER the days of the early 1950s? Accusations, congressional investigations, and imputed guilt could all be coalesced by the simple tactic of repetitious statements of purported wrongdoing. Professionals of extraordinary quality were brought down, and some say that whole agencies of the government never recovered from the loss of invaluable talent that resulted.

That era was not the first in which such tactics had proved effective and, sadly, it was not the last. I think we are currently observing a kind of biomedical McCarthyism, which, if unchecked, can leave a gaping hole where strong, scientifically based regulation of biologics used to be. The Bureau of Biologics of the Food and Drug Administration is an excellent agency of government that is under siege from a small cadre of strident critics. There is room for grave concern that their sustained attack might soon exceed the patience of the talented group of scientists . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
From the Departments of Medical Microbiology and Pediatrics, Graduate School, University of Wisconsin, Madison.

Footnotes
Reprint requests to 330 Bascom, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706 (Dr Osborn).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?