This Article  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on Web of Science (7)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Report on the National Institutes of Health Consensus Conference on Indications for Tonsillectomy and Adenoidectomy

Terrrence S. Carden, Jr, MD

JAMA. 1978;240(18):1961-1962.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

IF three quarters of a million young Americans were being subjected each year to a surgical procedure of doubtful benefit at a cost approaching $1 billion and untold cost in pain, suffering, and psychological trauma, the medical profession might expect a torrent of justifiable criticism. To many, this is an accurate description of the basis for controversy over tonsillectomy and adenotonsillectomy.

There are zealots on both sides of the issue. Those who consider themselves purists would permit tonsillectomy or adenotonsillectomy only in cases of carcinoma of the tonsil, recurrent peritonsillar abscess, cor pulmonale due to upper-airway obstruction, and dysphagia and weight loss due to digestive tract obstruction. If these criteria were accepted and enforced, the number of procedures performed annually would be less than 1% of the current rate.

At the other end of the spectrum are those physicians who are convinced that tonsillectomy and adenotonsillectomy are effective therapeutic and . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
American Medical Association Chicago

From the Division of Scientific Publications, American Medical Association, Chicago.

Footnotes
Reprint requests to Division of Scientific Publications, American Medical Association, 535 N Dearborn, Chicago, IL 60610 (Dr Carden).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?