This Article  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

William R. Barclay, MD

JAMA. 1979;241(16):1716.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The fable "The Boy Who Cried Wolf" (no pun intended) is familiar to all. The hero, or should we say villain, of the story falsely raised the specter of imminent hazard to draw attention to himself. Such seems to be the case with the propoxyphene inquiry, the latest in a series of alarms raised over the dangers of some pharmaceutical products. This new sortie follows the action against phenformin, which was the first drug to be removed from the market under the imminent hazard rule.

Now, it is perfectly proper and even desirable that society, through its political structure, should exercise some control over medical care; however, such control should be directed at cost and access and should not involve scientific issues for which political officials are not trained or in which they are not experienced in dealing. The laws of science are not established by majority vote of a . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Footnotes
Address editorial communications to the Editor, 535 N Dearborn St, Chicago, IL 60610.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?