You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 242 No. 4, July 27, 1979 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (32)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Role of Emotional Stress in the Development of Heart Disease

James C. Buell, MD; Robert S. Eliot, MD

JAMA. 1979;242(4):365-368.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

CURRENT interest in the relationship between emotional stress and cardiovascular disease stems from several observations. First, traditional risk factors are absent in more than half of the newly encountered cases of coronary heart disease. This observation suggests that other as yet unrecognized risk factors contribute to the pathogenesis of coronary heart disease. Second, there is impressive evidence that psychosocial conflict, emotions, and patterns of behavior can and do play an important role in the pathogenesis of certain types of cardiovascular disease. For example, using animals, investigators have been able to induce and document a variety of disease entities, including sustained hypertension, renal failure, accelerated atherosclerosis, coronary insufficiency, myocardial infarction, cardiomyopathy, and sudden death. However, whereas animal studies are easily controlled, comparably objective and controlled studies in man remain uncommon. At the present time, conclusions drawn from clinical research are more often supported by guilt through association and inference.

The field . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

From the Omaha Veterans Administration Hospital (Dr Buell), and Cardiovascular Center (Drs Buell and Eliot) and Division of Cardiovascular Medicine (Dr Eliot), University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha.


Footnotes

This article is one of a series sponsored by the American Heart Association, edited by C. Richard Conti, MD.

Reprint requests to Cardiovascular Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 42nd and Dewey Ave, Omaha, NE 68105 (Dr Buell).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1979 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.