You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 244 No. 23, December 12, 1980 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  LETTERS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Prolactin and Sexual Function

Bruno Ambrosi, MD; Maria Gaggini, MD; Paola Moriondo, MD; Giovanni Faglia, MD
University of Milan Milan, Italy

JAMA. 1980;244(23):2608.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—

Regarding the article by Spark and co-workers (243:750, 1980) about hormonal evaluation in sexually impotent men, we would like to emphasize some points, particularly about the role of prolactin on sexual function.

In the years 1975 to 1979, we saw 134 patients complaining of sexual disturbances (ie, impotence or ejaculatio precox) of nonorganic origin who were referred to our endocrine unit. All patients had serum luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), prolactin (PRL), testosterone, and 17 β-estradiol routinely determined by specific radioimmunoassay methods (Biodata Serono Kits).

In our series mean (±SE) serum LH and FSH concentrations were not significantly different from those obtained in normal subjects (LH, 11.5± 0.6 vs 11.2±1.4 mIU/mL; FSH, 8.1±0.6 vs 6.5±0.4 mIU/mL); abnormally high or low LH and FSH levels were recorded in only 5% and 7% of cases, respectively.

Though the mean serum PRL concentration in basal conditions did not significantly . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1980 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.