This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Edward W. Carsky, MD; Farhad Azimi, MD; Richard Mauceri, DO

JAMA. 1980;244(24):2762-2764.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

PERICARDIAL effusion is most often present in patients with uremia, viral pericarditis, and malignant neoplasms. It is also observed in many other conditions, including Dressler's syndrome, myxedema, collagen vascular diseases, congestive heart failure, lymphoma, sarcoidosis, and bacterial and tuberculous pericarditis.

Echocardiography is the method of choice for the diagnosis of pericardial effusion. This technique is highly accurate and reliable, but it is not used in all patients because frequently pericardial effusion is not clinically suspected. However, most patients with pericardial disease have plain chest roentgenograms, and in some of these the "water bottle" configuration of the heart leads to the proper diagnosis. The authors have found the epicardial fat sign to be useful in the diagnosis of pericardial effusion in patients in whom this condition is clinically not suspected and in whom the chest films show a normal heart configuration (Fig 1).

The epicardial fat sign as an aid in . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
From the Department of Radiology, St Joseph's Hospital Health Center (Drs Carsky and Azimi); and the Department of Radiology, Upstate Medical Center, State University of New York (Dr Mauceri), Syracuse.

Footnotes
Reprint requests to Department of Radiology, St Joseph's Hospital Health Center, Syracuse, NY 13203 (Dr Carsky).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?