This Article  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Florence A. Ruderman, PhD

JAMA. 1981;245(9):927-929.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

AS WE have seen, medical sociology has found some place in medical schools. But clearly, its status there is not high. In medicine's core department, internal medicine, it receives quite a low rating: most responding chairmen consider it unimportant, and many are strongly negative. True, in departments of pediatrics, and still more, in family medicine, its rating is better. Also, one might question the degree to which department chairmen are representative even of their own fields: perhaps age or other variables introduce a bias. But despite whatever questions might legitimately be raised about the results of the study, I believe the picture Petersdorf and Feinstein give us is essentially accurate. It would be a mistake to dismiss the evidence that many, if not most, medical educators—who, after all, have more contact with medical sociology than physicians generally do—have a view of the field that is not particularly flattering. I should . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
From the Department of Sociology, Brooklyn College, Brooklyn, NY.

Footnotes
Reprint requests to Department of Sociology, Brooklyn College, Bedford Avenue and Avenue H, Brooklyn, NY 11210 (Dr Ruderman).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?