This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Council on Scientific Affairs

JAMA. 1981;246(3):253-256.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

IN RECENT months, policy decisions have been made in the federal regulatory agencies that outline new programs for the identification of carcinogens with the aim of eliminating them, if possible, from our environment. While there can be no objection to this goal, it is true that once a political-public-policy process of such magnitude is mounted, it may be extremely difficult to change its course, even though evidence may become overwhelming that its cost may far outstrip any possible benefit.

News reports have claimed that 80% to 90% of all cancer may be due to environmental factors,¹ and this has often been translated to mean the occupational environment. With this assertion in mind, the Council on Scientific Affairs, with the help of several expert consultants, has reviewed the basis for the progress of the federal carcinogen regulation initiative.

The earnest desire of the federal regulators to prevent as many cancers . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
From the Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association, Chicago.

Footnotes
This report is not intended as a standard for medical care. Standards of medical care that are determined locally and are constantly subject to change are established on the basis of all the several facts of the individual case.

Reprint requests to Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association, 535 N Dearborn St, Chicago, IL 60610 (Rogers J. Smith, MD).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?