This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Jeffrey D. Parke, MSBME; Sandra E. Higgins, RN
Physio-Control Corporation Redmond, Wash

JAMA. 1982;248(4):427.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—

Physio-Control Corporation has received reports of current arcing during defibrillation in patients who had used topical nitroglycerin ointment. Subsequently, tests of these ointments have shown them to have low electrical conductivity. For example, the resistivity of Nitrol ointment was found to be 6x10⁸ -cm as compared with 9.4 -cm for Hewlett Packard Redux Electrode Paste,¹ a typical defibrillation electrode contact gel. Nitro-Bid ointment resistivity was determined to be 4x10⁹ -cm. We assume that other brands of this preparation would have similar resistivity.

Noting that the lanolin-petroleum-based ointments seemed to mix poorly with electrode gels, we conducted tests on anesthetized dogs. After applying the ointment to shaved dog skin in the recommended manner, 200-joule shocks were delivered with a Physio-Control Lifepak 6 Defibrillator on the treated skin. Standard electrode gel and contact pressure were used.

The results demonstrated the effects of defibrillation through an insulator. . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?