You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 251 No. 13, April 6, 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (7)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Selection of a Prosthetic Heart Valve

Albert Starr, MD; Gary L. Grunkemeier, PhD

JAMA. 1984;251(13):1739-1742.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

USEFUL knowledge results from information collected in the past and synthesized, condensed, and organized to provide the best possible clue to future performance. Our purpose here is to arrive at that point by a review of the experience with heartvalve replacement during the last 30 years. Examination of data from current prostheses must be viewed from the perspective of experience, not expectations.

ORIGINS OF VALVE REPLACEMENT: THE 1950s

The earliest valvular substitute was Hufnagel's ball valve inserted into the descending aorta in 1952. With the introduction of cardiopulmonary bypass in 1953 came the possibility of complete replacement of cardiac valves in their anatomic position, and many laboratories and investigators devised replacement prostheses. Among the devices tried were artificial trileaflet valves made of pericardium, Teflon, Dacron, polyurethane, and Silastic; monocusp flap valves made of steel, polyester film (Mylar), or Silastic; and other configurations, including butterfly, sleeve, bicuspid, and quadricuspid made from . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

From the Division of Cardiopulmonary Surgery, Oregon Health Sciences University, and the St Vincent Hospital and Medical Center, Portland, Ore.


Footnotes

This article is one of a series sponsored by the American Heart Association.

Reprint requests to Division of Cardiopulmonary Surgery, Oregon Health Sciences University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR 97201 (Dr Starr).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1984 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.