You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 251 No. 4, January 27, 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  LETTERS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Military Casualties

Robert L. Turk, MD
Santee, Calif

JAMA. 1984;251(4):468.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—

I do not doubt the enthusiastic advocacy by Baxt and Moody1 of rotocraft for emergency evacuation, but I question their figures. If mortality in Vietnam was "one death per 100 casualties," then we had 5,400,000 casualties. Likewise, the Korean War had 1,600,000 and World War II, 6,666,666. Even knowing the propensity of the military (all sides) to understate losses, I find these figures rather high.

The best arguments for helicopters are our unbounded wealth and our willingness to spend it in this use. . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1984 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.