You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 253 No. 14, April 12, 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  COMMENTARY
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (42)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Commentary on the Published Results of the Lipid Research Clinics Coronary Primary Prevention Trial

Richard A. Kronmal, PhD

JAMA. 1985;253(14):2091-2093.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

THE LIPID Research Clinics Coronary Primary Prevention Trial (LRC-CPPT) was a randomized double-blind clinical trial testing the efficacy of the cholesterollowering drug cholestyramine taken in conjunction with a cholesterol-lowering diet in reducing the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) in asymptomatic middle-aged men with primary hypercholesterolemia. The CPPT trial results were described in detail in two recent articles in THE JOURNAL.1,2 The first article presented the results of the clinical trial itself, comparing the occurrence of cardiovascular disease in the two study groups: (1) cholestyramine plus diet and (2) placebo plus diet. The second article analyzed data from the two groups separately and within each group examined the relationship of lowering of levels of total cholesterol and of low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) to the incidence of primary cardiovascular end points. The trial was well designed and superbly carried out. However, the reported conclusions seem to go beyond what is reasonably . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

From the Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle.


Footnotes

Reprint requests to Department of Biostatistics, SC 32, University of Washington School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195 (Dr Kronmal).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.