You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 253 No. 19, May 17, 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  TOPICS IN RADIOLOGY
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (13)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Radiology of Disorders of the Sacroiliac Joints

Charles S. Resnik, MD; Donald Resnick, MD

JAMA. 1985;253(19):2863-2866.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

MANY disorders can lead to radiological abnormalities of the sacroiliac joints. Some present a characteristic appearance, while others may be diagnosed by analyzing both the appearance and the distribution of findings (Table).1 This article describes the radiological features of these various disorders that often allow an exact diagnosis to be made.

Method of Evaluation

The standard method of radiological evaluation of the sacroiliac joints varies among different institutions. Although oblique views are widely used, the best angle of obliquity is difficult to determine, and visualization of the joints may not be optimal. A common routine examination combines a straight anteroposterior roentgenogram of the pelvis (see Figs 3, 4, and 6) with a second anteroposterior film obtained with cephalad angulation. Such technique results in the sacroiliac joints being viewed more directly (see Figs 2 and 5). Some authors have suggested that computed tomography is superior to conventional radiography in the . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Radiology, Medical College of Virginia, Richmond (Dr C. S. Resnik), and Veterans Administration Medical Center, San Diego (Dr D. Resnick).


Footnotes

Reprint requests to the Department of Radiology, Veterans Administration Medical Center, 3350 LaJolla Village Dr, San Diego, CA 92161 (Dr D. Resnick).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.