This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (1)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Walter Flamenbaum, MD; Neill S. Cohen, PsyD

JAMA. 1985;253(5):687-688.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Inherent in prescribing drugs is a decision that the benefit resulting from therapy is greater than the risk associated with a given medication. A corollary of this concept should be an ongoing review of whether it is necessary to continue the administration of a particular drug indefinitely, or whether it is safe to "unmedicate" under certain circumstances. Reviews of this type have shown, for example, that adult epileptics taking phenytoin can be unmedicated with impunity in 60% of the cases.¹ Another well-accepted but controversial precept of medical care concerns the role of nonpharmacologic therapy for patients with hypertension. Specifically, the effect of weight reduction and sodium restriction on the drug treatment of hypertension, and the resultant influence on morbidity and mortality, remains incompletely elucidated.

Langford and co-workers² report in this issue of THE JOURNAL the results of a study designed to determine whether patients receiving aggressive antihypertensive therapy . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
Beth Israel Medical Center New York

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?