This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Correction  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (52)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

David N. Danforth, MD

JAMA. 1985;253(6):811-818.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

CESAREAN section has been an integral part of obstetrics ever since the revolutionary article of Sänger¹ in 1882, in which he directed attention to the necessity of suturing the uterine incision. In the ensuing years the operation has been repeatedly modified to improve its safety. As safety has increased, so too has the range of problems that cesarean section is used to solve, to a degree that some consider to be a cause for concern.² In 1970, about 195,000 cesarean sections were performed in US hospitals, an incidence of about 5.5%; in 1978, there were 510,000 women who had abdominal deliveries, accounting for 15.2% of hospital deliveries.³ The figures continue to rise (Fig 1), but the indications for performing the operation are so broad that it is unreasonable to anticipate any major increase in the immediate future. Indeed, in a few areas the indications may become more . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
From the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago; and the Evanston Hospital, Evanston, Ill.

Footnotes
Reprints not available.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?