You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 253 No. 8, February 22, 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  LETTERS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Activated Charcoal in Phenobarbital Overdose

Mark J. Goldberg, MD; William G. Berlinger, MD; Glen D. Park, PharmD
University of Iowa Iowa City

JAMA. 1985;253(8):1120-1121.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—

Previous studies have shown that the administration of multiple oral doses of activated charcoal will decrease the elimination half-life of phenobarbital.1,2 An uncontrolled trial in patients with phenobarbital overdose treated with this regimen suggested that coma time and duration of mechanical ventilation were decreased consistent with the decrease in phenobarbital halflife.3 However, the obvious thesis that decreasing the half-life of phenobarbital by administering multiple doses of activated charcoal would result in a decrease in coma time and duration of mechanical ventilation in patients with phenobarbital overdose requires final proof.

Pond et al4 have tested this thesis. In a small randomized controlled trial, they have confirmed that repeated doses of activated charcoal, compared with single doses, decrease the serum half-life of phenobarbital in patients with phenobarbital overdose. But, it is surprising that the duration of mechanical ventilation was not different in the two groups. However, . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.