You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 253 No. 9, March 1, 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  EDITORIALS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (6)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Still More on Streptococcal Pharyngitis: An Important Disease With Yet Unresolved Clinical Issues

Vincent A. Fulginiti, MD

JAMA. 1985;253(9):1302.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The report by Krober et al1 in this issue of THE JOURNAL keeps alive the controversies that have surrounded the management of group A β-hemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis (GABS) in clinical practice. The physicians from the Tripler and Madigan Army Medical Centers have shown that early penicillin treatment resulted in significant clinical improvement when contrasted to a 72-hour delay in the initiation of penicillin treatment. This issue has also recently been addressed with the reincarnation of a study by John Nelson2 performed in 1958-1959, and reported in 1984. Both studies suggest that early treatment improves clinical symptoms, despite expert statements and studies to the contrary.

The "standard" management of streptococcal pharyngitis has been a mainstay of infectious disease dogma for decades. Physicians were comfortable with the liberal use of the throat culture in children with sore throats and their contacts; in some cases of recurrent disease, even pets were . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

University of Arizona Health Sciences Center Tucson



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.