You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 254 No. 13, October 4, 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  LETTERS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Differentiating Cervical Lipomas From Thyroid Nodules

James C. Andrews, MD; Marilyn C. Zimmerman, MD; Dennis M. Moore, MD
UCLA School of Medicine Los Angeles

JAMA. 1985;254(13):1719.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—

In the article entitled "Cervical Lipomas Masquerading as Thyroid Nodules," authors Leonidas et al1 conclude by recommending computed tomographic (CT) scanning to evaluate and differentiate "cold" nodules of the thyroid from extrathyroidal tissue, specifically lipomas. We would like to point out a valuable diagnostic test that apparently was overlooked, that of fine-needle aspiration (FNA).

This modality has been successfully and safely used in the diagnosis of head and neck tumors since the 1930s. Fine-needle aspiration has been found to be highly accurate in its diagnostic capabilities, notably in establishing the diagnosis of "cold" solid thyroid nodules.2,3 With aspiration cytology, unnecessary surgery and excessive radiation exposure can often be avoided.4 In an exhaustive review of the literature on FNA of thyroid nodules, Ashcraft and Van Herle5 report an impressive diagnostic reliability of 97.8%, with an overall false-negative incidence of malignancy in 1.7%, and a . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.