This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Roland J. Branconnier, MA
Institute for Psychopharmacologic Research Brookline, Mass

JAMA. 1985;254(17):2407.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—

I read with interest the article by Drs Eslinger et al¹ entitled "Neuropsychological Detection of Abnormal Mental Decline in Older Persons." The article described a brief neuropsychological test battery that correctly classified 87% of normal controls and dementias in a validation study, and 89% in a subsequent cross-validation study.

The method the authors used to discriminate between the normals and dementias was a stepwise linear discriminant-function analysis that used scores from eight neuropsychological tests as potential predictors. This statistical method maximizes the identification of true-positive and true-negative cases, with a minimum number of predictors, and thus optimizes for a parameter called "test efficiency."^2,3 However, my colleagues and I have questioned the value of test efficiency as the appropriate characteristic to be maximized in diagnostic screening tests for dementia.⁴

Galen and Gambino³ stress that high test efficiency is desirable when a disease is serious . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Footnotes
Edited by Drummond Rennie, MD, Senior Contributing Editor.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?