 |
 |

Differentiating Dementia From Normal-Reply
Paul J. Eslinger, PhD
The University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics Iowa City
JAMA. 1985;254(17):2407-2408.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
In Reply.—
It appears that Mr Branconnier has misinterpreted the thrust of our article and the nature and purpose of our screening test.1 It is not designed to "diagnose" dementing illness but to identify older persons who deserve to have the benefit of comprehensive diagnostic studies. A positive result on the test would raise the suspicion that some form of mental decline, temporary or not, may be occurring and that medical attention and further psychological assessment should be considered. A false-positive finding would be clarified as such rather rapidly, most likely in a first medical interview, without any serious financial, psychological, or social consequences ensuing. In fact, the contrary might occur. Persons scoring as a false-positive may do so because of social, psychological, or medical problems, eg, depression, that may well benefit from medical attention.
The letter reveals some misconceptions about dementia that deserve noting. First, there is insufficient
. . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
|