This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (3)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Joseph F. Boyle, MD

JAMA. 1985;254(3):407.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Elsewhere in this issue of THE JOURNAL¹ there appears yet another in a growing list of reports on variations in rates of utilization of health services or variations in medical practice patterns.

The current report leaves something to be desired in its methodology, completeness of analysis, and some of the deductions derived from the authors' data. For example, while pointing out that differences in fertility rates completely explained the variation in the observed-to-expected rates of cesarean section, the authors then include 7,260 days of hospitalization for cesarean section in computing potential savings that might occur were such variations eliminated. It would seem equally illogical to add 6,324 days for reduction of fractured femurs unless the authors are proposing a safety program to prevent people from breaking their legs. These two items account for over 30% of the excess bed use cited. In a similar fashion, one might also question . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
Immediate Past President American Medical Association Chicago

Footnotes
Address editorial communications to the Editor, 535 N Dearborn St, Chicago, IL 60610.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?