You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 254 No. 8, August 23, 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  LETTERS
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Guidelines for Handling Parenteral Antineoplastics-Reply

R. Mark Evans, PhD
Program on Drugs American Medical Association Chicago

JAMA. 1985;254(8):1033-1034.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In Reply.—

As staff scientist to the Council on Scientific Affairs, I researched and prepared the report entitled "Guidelines for Handling Parenteral Antineoplastics." Randall and Constable are concerned that readers might infer from the introduction to this report that combined chemotherapy and radiation may lead to a higher risk of secondary nonlymphocytic leukemia than chemotherapy alone. Careful reading of the text shows that we did not imply that risks were higher. The statement that patients received radiation therapy was included in an attempt to describe further the therapeutic intervention. Randall and Constable are correct in that not all patients in one of our references (Am J Med 1983; 75:449-454) received radiation in addition to MOPP therapy (Mustargen [mechlorethamine hydrochloride], Oncovin [vincristine sulfate], procarbazine, and prednisone).

However, I strongly object to the language of the last paragraph of their letter. This is an attempt to embroil this report in the controversial . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.