You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 255 No. 20, May 23, 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  LETTERS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

On the Physical Death of Jesus Christ

Matthew J. Ellenhorn, MD; Deborah P. Oles, MD; Samuel J. Smith, MD; Robert Adler, MD
Los Angeles

Naomi L. Ellenhorn, MD
Chicago

Joshua D. I. Ellenhorn, MD
Cincinnati

Jonathan Ben-Ezra, MD
Duarte, Calif

Robert H. Roth, MD
Mission Hills, Calif

Joel L. Schwartz, MD
Burbank, Calif

Steven Weinstock, MD
Torrance, Calif

JAMA. 1986;255(20):2754-2755.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—

We wish to pose some questions regarding the publication of an article' that marks one of the most unusual events in the long and illustrious history of THE JOURNAL: a theological discussion entitled "On the Physical Death of Jesus Christ."1

Why was a theological article published in a scientific journal?

This question will probably not be entirely answered by the editor, since it must relate to numerous contemporary trends or problems relating to American Christian religious life, the backgrounds of the writers (presumably Christian; one is a Methodist pastor), the views of the JAMA editor, and his perception of the interests and needs of the medical community, which JAMA has so admirably served for so many years.

The authors admit that the whole subject is "shrouded" in controversy, yet they have dignified their rationale for writing this document as an "interdisciplinary" investigation. They did not, they . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.