You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 255 No. 23, June 20, 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  LETTERS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Use of Smokeless Tobacco Among Adolescents

Earl J. Berman; Paul M. Fischer, MD; John W. Richards, Jr, MD
Brian Strickman-Levitas Medical College of Georgia Augusta

JAMA. 1986;255(23):3245.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—

The recently published American Medical Association report, "Tobacco Product Liability," stated that there are no national data on teenage chewing tobacco use.1 However, there have been several regional reports of adolescent smokeless tobacco use based on self-report data. These have indicated use rates ranging between 10% and 40%.1-3 Recently, we conducted a study at two senior high schools, one urban and the other suburban, involving a total of 296 students and using a self-report questionnaire. It is known that the self-reporting of smoking is a sensitive subject for high school students and that significant underreporting is common.4 To overcome this, smoking researchers use validation techniques such as the "bogus pipeline."4,5 In this technique, students are told that their tobacco use responses will be validated by measuring saliva thiocyanate levels. Saliva specimens are then collected but not chemically processed. This is the first reported . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.