This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Bruce E. Haynes, MD
Harbor-UCLA Medical Center Torrance, Calif

JAMA. 1986;255(5):611-612.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—

Smith and Bodai¹ broached an important issue in attempting to define urban paramedics' scope of practice; unfortunately, their presentation was curiously one sided.

I could find no information in their reference 9 about increased costs of paramedic programs,² as claimed, nor could I find anything in reference 7 to support their statement that surgical patients may be harmed by care at the scene of the injury.³ Although it is a small point, I believe that the first report of successful prehospital defibrillation was made by Pantridge and Geddes⁴ in 1967, not Adgey in 1969.

The "Hypovolemia" section of the review stated that a number of patients died "because of delays in transport caused by paramedic interventions," and they refer to their retrospective review of 15 patients published in abstract form. Their full report is now available, and I find it impossible, when reading . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?